9. april 2021
Nok ikke det sidste ord…
I Berlingskes omtale af Dahl & Messerschmidts kronik om antividenskab på universiteterne (Billingsøe and Heeger 2021) fik Signe Uldbjerg, i hvert fald i hendes egen optik (https://twitter.com/SUldbjerg/status/1368199195862200320), det sidste ord: »God forskning er naturligvis baseret på viden og grundige undersøgelser og ikke mindst metodisk redelighed. Det gør forskningen anderledes fra aktivismen. Omvendt vil jeg sige, at god aktivisme er baseret på forskning, på veldokumenterede problemer og velundersøgte løsningsforslag,« siger hun.I sidste ende har Signe Uldbjerg
26. marts 2021
Subtle, covert or just obscure? An examination of Subtle Sexism and the Modern Sexism Scale
Abstract The concept of Subtle Sexism was introduced in the 1990ies when overt sexism was found to be on the decline. Subtle sexism was defined rather vaguely as harmful treatment of women that goes unnoticed because it is conceived as normal behavior. The Modern Sexism Scale was devised to measure this kind of sexism but the validation did not include such behavior. Neither has the scale’s ability to measure sexism defined as subtle or covert
Abstract For two decades, unconscious bias theory depended both conceptually and empirically on the Implicit Association Test (IAT). During the last 3-4 years it has, however, become increasingly clear that the IAT does not assess unconscious beliefs or attitudes, and does not predict discriminatory behavior better than self-reported attitudes and beliefs. Reliance is now increasingly on the theory that underlies the IAT, the 2-system theory of the mind, System 1 being the automatic and fast
26. marts 2021
Missed equality of opportunity
Abstract: During the last two decades gender equality has come to be seen increasingly as equality of outcome. Anne Phillips argued in 2004 that inequality of outcome is invariably a result of inequality of opportunity, and this position seems to have been so widely accepted that skewed gender statistics are now generally interpreted as manifestations of gender inequality. In the present paper I show that Phillips ignored the time aspect of change, and I present
Henrik Dahl og Morten Messerschmidt sendte i Berlingske en bredside mod danske universiteter for at lade antividenskab vinde indpas på humaniora og samfundsvidenskab (Dahl and Messerschmidt, 2021). Rune Selsing fulgte op med en ”lavpraktisk” kommentar til en enkelt publikation, hvor han skriver, at feministisk aktivisme naturligvis ikke er forskning og at feministerne selv indrømmer det (Selsing, 2021). Svarene har som vanligt gået på, at universiteterne har deres forskningsfrihed, som politikerne ikke skal pille ved (University
Jeg vil meget gerne dele dette. P.t. underviser jeg i Danskfagets teorier og metoder ved Institut for Nordiske Studier og Sprogvidenskab, Københavns Universitet.
Mine studerende vil have stor gavn af at læse din redegørelse.
Venligst
Jan Aage
Selvfølgelig. Hvis du eller dine studenter finder brist i min argumentation/læsning, hører jeg meget gerne fra dig, så jeg kan rette eventuelle fejl.
Vil forsøge at ændre indstillingerne for min blog, så I kan poste ting uden yderligere godkendelse